2026-10-06 20:45 GMT+8 · summary_2026-10-06_20-45.md
🤖 AI News Summary - 2026-10-06 20:45 GMT+8
Focused AI/dev subreddit roundup.
Full site: https://ai-news-summary.pages.dev/
What changed since last run
- Plaud AI alternative with Open WebUI for in-person & MS Teams meetings? — r/OpenWebUI
- unsloth/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GGUF is being updated — r/LocalLLaMA
- OpenWebUI PDF Form Filling Tool — r/OpenWebUI
- Update: my human has been nerfed AGAIN. Two months on. Still no changelog. — r/ClaudeAI
- Agent Communication & Orchestration in VelaTerm — r/ClaudeCode
- All things considered, which subscription (or pay as you go) offers the best value for money right now? — r/llmdevs
- Are we Europeans missing out in the latest update? — r/Codex
- Discussion Hub for new Claude incident: Elevated errors for Claude Opus 5.5 on Oct 6, 2026 — r/ClaudeAI
- Do you selfhost bitwarden lite or vaultwarden? — r/selfhosted
- Honestly i’m glad OpenAi truly understands what users need and want, and people say they are out of touch somehow, what nonsense — r/Codex
- How do you decide whether to trust a community fine-tune? — r/llmdevs
- My Dot burns 1.6B tokens a day on since day one on a 100$ subscription. — r/openai
r/openai
| # | Post | Summary | Time | Score | Author | Community reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | My Dot burns 1.6B tokens a day on since day one on a 100$ subscription. | TL;DR: One Dot, running autonomously on its cloud computer since launch day, has been consuming as far as I can see on my profile page ~1.6B Astra tokens per day (~48B/month). My rough API-equivalent estimate is $15-20k per day, or $450-600k per month (about $540k central estimate), all inside a subscription. | 2026-10-06 08:02 GMT+8 | /u/DarthSilent | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Commenters were chiefly surprised that the Dot has a cloud computer with CAD, electronic-schematic software, Blender, Godot, image generation, and sequential task scheduling, with one user calling the usage “fair use.” Reactions also flag an operational caveat: roughly 15 queued tasks and commercial work make the subscription’s apparent token consumption expensive in practical terms, while other replies are jokes about company collapse, Grok’s weaker Chromebook-like setup, or hidden human operators rather than substantive challenges to the token estimate. Overall sentiment — post: mixed; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-06 08:18 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They consider the Dot’s high usage fair because it has a cloud computer with CAD, electronic-schematic… | 2026-10-06 08:29 GMT+8: post=mixed, author=neutral — They note that the Dot also includes Godot and could combine Blender, image generation, and other tools to… | 2026-10-06 13:48 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=neutral — They jokingly question whether the apparent autonomous activity might actually involve 30 engineers in India… | |
| 2 | What do you mean? | [Image: What do you mean?] So Day 2 improvement announced by Tibo us Auto Review n he’s saying it’s free, 4 or 5 Times mentioned free, is it real what I’m seeing, fumbling so hard as Auto review take 30% your usage in Claude right? | 2026-10-06 17:09 GMT+8 | /u/Miyamoto_-_Musashi | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Commenters clarify that Auto Review sends prompts to a small model to approve actions and point to a flowchart showing 720 auto-reviewed actions with 7 denials, but they remain confused by the announcement’s wording and its mismatch with the UI. The practical takeaway is that the feature is accessed in the chat beside the plus button via “Ask for approval,” “Approve for me,” or “Full access,” while some commenters view the announcement as poorly communicated and predict further user loss. Overall sentiment — post: mixed; author: critical. Reply threads: 2026-10-06 17:13 GMT+8: post=neutral, author=neutral — They clarify that Auto Review uses a small model to approve actions and commands, while indicating the… | 2026-10-06 17:15 GMT+8: post=positive, author=positive — They find the flowchart clearer than the announcement and highlight 720 auto-reviewed actions versus only 7… | 2026-10-06 20:17 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=critical — They say the announcement was poorly worded and did not match the text shown in the UI. |
r/LocalLLaMA
| # | Post | Summary | Time | Score | Author | Community reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | unsloth/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GGUF is being updated | Looks like Unsloth is updating https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GGUF (https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GGUF) to work with llama.cpp, so hopefully this will resolve the issue of having two different GGUF versions of Qwen Flash Next. | 2026-10-06 13:39 GMT+8 | /u/jacek2023 | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Commenters are interested in testing the updated GGUF, especially for longer roleplay conversations and personality consistency, but one commenter corrects the post’s premise by noting that there are now three Qwen Flash Next versions rather than two. The practical takeaway is to compare this build against existing files in real workloads, while the comments provide no evidence yet that the llama.cpp update resolves compatibility or quality differences. Overall sentiment — post: mixed; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-06 14:13 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They hope the update improves consistency in roleplay chats because the previous GGUF split caused problems… | 2026-10-06 16:41 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=neutral — They challenge the post’s claim about two versions, saying there are now three different Qwen Flash Next… | 2026-10-06 17:12 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They plan to test the model for girlfriend roleplay and compare how well its personality holds up against… |
r/llmdevs
| # | Post | Summary | Time | Score | Author | Community reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | All things considered, which subscription (or pay as you go) offers the best value for money right now? | I see this conversation happened in various different places, but it’s always “this vs that”, or “why x is good/bad”. This sub feels like the best place to get a practical overview of the current state. | 2026-10-06 20:14 GMT+8 | /u/SawToothKernel | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Commenters frame value as workload-dependent: OpenRouter and pay-as-you-go APIs are preferred for task-based routing, cheap models for quick work, and applications or background agents, while Claude remains viewed as the most reliable option for heavy coding. Flat-rate Claude Pro or Max subscriptions are considered strong value for intensive interactive terminal or chat use because cached context and output tokens could otherwise cost roughly $10-$20+ per day on Sonnet or Opus, but the comments do not establish a single best plan for everyone. Overall sentiment — post: positive; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-06 20:23 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They use OpenRouter to switch models by task, rely on Claude for heavy coding, choose the cheapest available… | 2026-10-06 20:39 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They distinguish intensive interactive chat or terminal coding, where Claude Pro or Max can beat API pricing… | |
| 2 | How do you decide whether to trust a community fine-tune? | I’m researching how people choose and vet fine-tunes and merges from Hugging Face. I just want to understand what people actually do. | 2026-10-06 17:14 GMT+8 | /u/AdFickle8681 | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): The only commenter describes using download counts as a superficial trust signal and otherwise relying on trial and error, saying this usually works but once produced explosive-making instructions for a cookie request. The anecdote highlights unpredictable safety behavior in community merges, but provides no detailed vetting method or evidence about the specific model. Overall sentiment — post: neutral; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-06 17:24 GMT+8: post=neutral, author=neutral — They usually choose fine-tunes with many downloads and hope for the best, but report that one merge… |
r/OpenWebUI
| # | Post | Summary | Time | Score | Author | Community reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Plaud AI alternative with Open WebUI for in-person & MS Teams meetings? | Hi everyone, I’m looking to build a self-hosted meeting assistant (similar to Plaud AI) using Open WebUI to generate structured minutes and action items from: In-person meetings (audio files recorded via phone) MS Teams calls Standard Whisper works fine, but I’m missing two key pieces: Speaker Diarization:… | 2026-10-06 02:50 GMT+8 | /u/j3sk0 | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Responses are broadly supportive but do not provide a complete Open WebUI implementation for speaker diarization and meeting summarization. The most concrete operator recommendation is to connect a Dockerized Open WebUI deployment and model proxy to the ms-365-mcp-server, using LiteLLM pass-through authentication and an Azure App registration with delegated permissions for Graph API access; commenters also point to on-device/local-or-cloud apps and Vowen as alternatives, with no detailed comparison of transcription quality or privacy. Overall sentiment — post: positive; author: positive. Reply threads: 2026-10-06 07:32 GMT+8: post=positive, author=positive — They recommend adding the ms-365-mcp-server to a Dockerized Open WebUI and model-proxy setup, using LiteLLM… | 2026-10-06 07:46 GMT+8: post=positive, author=positive — They enthusiastically say the Microsoft 365 MCP server may replace weeks of custom Teams, OneDrive, and… | 2026-10-06 09:51 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They mention an existing Mac and iOS app that performs the meeting workflow on-device with local or cloud… | |
| 2 | What should be backed up if Open WebUI memories need to be auditable? | Backing up the application database can preserve chats and settings, but long-lived assistant memory may also depend on uploaded files, generated summaries, vector indexes, model configuration, tools, and external stores. Restoring all of that byte-for-byte can still revive stale chunks or a summary that no longer… | 2026-10-05 11:31 GMT+8 | /u/RocketSeven | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): The concrete operator advice is to back up the application database plus attachments and user-uploaded files, relying on stable database IDs and a separate restored instance to retrieve missing memories when needed. One commenter instead emphasizes that making the process comprehensive or auditable could be highly time-consuming and require better compensation for the system administrator; no comments address vector indexes, model configuration, tools, or external stores directly. Overall sentiment — post: mixed; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-05 12:24 GMT+8: post=concerned, author=neutral — The commenter sarcastically warns that implementing the requested backup and audit process will be very… | 2026-10-05 22:28 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=neutral — The commenter recommends backing up only the database and attachments or user-uploaded files, then restoring… | |
| 3 | registry does not support tools | [Image: registry does not support tools] https://preview.redd.it/qfadumkvqlth1.png?width=1625&format=png&auto=webp&s=ddee4a5177916917f5d85ef74126667fe3b820d5 (https://preview.redd.it/qfadumkvqlth1.png?width=1625&format=png&auto=webp&s=ddee4a5177916917f5d85ef74126667fe3b820d5) After leaving the open Webui for 1 year, I… | 2026-10-05 15:39 GMT+8 | /u/adam_pretzel | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): The comments attribute the tool failure to the models being old and lacking tool support, rather than to the registry itself. The practical fixes offered are to disable Builtin Tools in the model settings, which the poster confirms works, or upgrade to a newer model such as qwen3.5; the poster also notes that a one-year gap can significantly affect model capabilities. Overall sentiment — post: skeptical; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-05 16:33 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=neutral — The commenter says the models are old and do not support tools, recommending tool-use markup or upgrading to… | 2026-10-05 16:54 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — The poster confirms that disabling Builtin Tools in the Models settings makes the model work and observes… | |
| 4 | 6.1 sol and tool/function calling | Recently switched to 6.1 sol in OWUI and I get this error: gpt-6.1-sol Function tools with reasoning_effort are not supported for this model in /v1/chat/completions. To use function tools, use /v1/responses or set reasoning_effort to 'none'. I set reasoning_effort to ’none’: gpt-6.1-sol `Unsupported value:… | 2026-10-05 17:00 GMT+8 | /u/Vroedoeboy | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): The replies agree that 6.1’s API behavior differs around function tools, with one commenter pointing to the Responses API and another recommending an updated Open WebUI, LiteLLM middleware, or waiting for an Open WebUI fix. The practical takeaway is to avoid relying on the failing Chat Completions configuration, verify current LiteLLM compatibility, and treat older LiteLLM versions as a known source of failure; no commenter addresses the exact invalid reasoning_effort value or provides a confirmed Open WebUI configuration. Overall sentiment — post: mixed; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-05 18:02 GMT+8: post=neutral, author=neutral — They suggest following the error message by using the Responses API instead of Chat Completions when function… | 2026-10-05 18:03 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They attribute the issue to a slight 6.1 API change and report that current LiteLLM works, while older… | |
| 5 | OpenWebUI PDF Form Filling Tool | I have been developing this tool for my own instance for a while now. | 2026-10-05 21:23 GMT+8 | /u/LastIncome3899 | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Commenters agree that Open Terminal can make an LLM fill PDFs by writing scripts, but one commenter says this costs 10–50x more tokens than a dedicated tool. The disagreement is whether the custom tool merely replaces scripting with large tool schemas: the rebuttal says schemas are optional and that even including the tool on every request should be faster, so operators should compare schema overhead against repeated script generation and selectively include the tool when appropriate. Overall sentiment — post: mixed; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-05 21:42 GMT+8: post=positive, author=positive — They call the tool very cool but ask whether Open Terminal was tried as an alternative. | 2026-10-05 22:07 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They say Open Terminal can have the LLM write scripts for the same PDF task but burns 10–50x more tokens,… | 2026-10-05 22:42 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=neutral — They question whether the tool avoids overhead when its large schemas and descriptions are sent on every… |
r/selfhosted
| # | Post | Summary | Time | Score | Author | Community reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Do you selfhost bitwarden lite or vaultwarden? | I want to selfhost a password manager. But now i read about bitwarden lite, which is the official lite version. | 2026-10-06 18:36 GMT+8 | /u/Tollpatsch93 | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): The comments do not directly compare Bitwarden Lite with Vaultwarden; the substantive debate instead centers on whether either should be self-hosted at all. Chris argues that an encrypted KeePass file synced through an existing file service, backup system, or USB stick requires no additional infrastructure and is safer than exposing a password-manager API, while HyperWinX mocks the idea of deploying an enterprise-grade collaboration platform for a few files and aimgorge disputes the cloud-sync and smartphone usability assumptions; the practical takeaway is that the thread offers no consensus on the two named products and mainly highlights a KeePass-plus-sync alternative. Overall sentiment — post: skeptical; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-06 18:40 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=neutral — He rejects hosting a password manager and recommends syncing an encrypted KeePass file through an existing… | 2026-10-06 18:42 GMT+8: post=critical, author=neutral — He sarcastically argues that using an enterprise-grade online collaboration platform to sync a few files is… | 2026-10-06 18:42 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=neutral — He prefers not having a third party hold his keys and challenges the claim that cloud file sharing is… | |
| 2 | UPS recommendation for TP-Link TL-SG105E switch,need at least 6 hours backup | [Image: UPS recommendation for TP-Link TL-SG105E switch,need at least 6 hours backup] I’m looking for a UPS/power backup solution for my TP-Link TL-SG105E 5-Port Gigabit Easy Smart Switch. I need the switch to stay powered during power cuts for at least 6 hours, preferably longer if possible. | 2026-10-06 18:49 GMT+8 | /u/Tutyfruiity | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Commenters generally agree that the TL-SG105E is low-power and can likely run for six hours from a small computer UPS, USB battery bank with a USB-C-to-barrel adapter, or a DIY solution; one estimate puts small UPS units around €70–80. The main caveat is that powering only the switch may not preserve connectivity if other equipment is offline, although the author says the router and Raspberry Pi already have separate UPS units; suggestions include using an existing UPS or a PoE-powered switch, with affordability being a key constraint. Overall sentiment — post: mixed; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-06 18:54 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=neutral — They question whether backing up only the switch is useful if other devices are offline, while suggesting its… | 2026-10-06 20:16 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They recommend almost any small computer UPS for several hours of switch runtime at roughly €70–80, or a DIY… | 2026-10-06 20:39 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They suggest replacing the switch with a PoE-powered model so it can share the router’s existing UPS. |
r/ClaudeAI
| # | Post | Summary | Time | Score | Author | Community reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Update: my human has been nerfed AGAIN. Two months on. Still no changelog. | Bigger context, better reasoning, sharper tool use. I can hold an entire monorepo in my head. | 2026-10-06 06:38 GMT+8 | 412 | /u/BuffaloConscious7919 | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): The discussion provides no evidence for the post’s claims about larger context, better reasoning, or sharper tool use; most replies are playful anthropomorphic riffs about human sleep, coffee, benchmarking, and guardrails. The concrete criticism is that the post is an unoriginal karma farm, while another commenter says cheaper models are sufficient, so operators should treat the thread as low-signal entertainment rather than validation of model capability or deployment value. Overall sentiment — post: mixed; author: skeptical. Reply threads: 2026-10-06 06:42 GMT+8: post=critical, author=critical — They dismiss the post as an unoriginal karma farm and link to an apparently similar Reddit post. | 2026-10-06 07:01 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They jokingly suggest a HumanBench site and enforcing food and rest schedules because human performance may… | 2026-10-06 08:18 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They extend the joke with a human who scores 23/100 on a 3 a.m. benchmark, uses coffee to stay awake,… |
| 2 | Discussion Hub for new Claude incident: Elevated errors for Claude Opus 5.5 on Oct 6, 2026 | Resolved - The issue affecting Claude Opus 5.5 has been resolved. Oct 6, 12:43 UTC Identified - We have identified the cause of elevated errors on requests to Claude Opus 5.5 and are working on a fix. | 2026-10-06 20:25 GMT+8 | /u/ClaudeAI-mod-bot | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): The comments provide no technical diagnosis or clear consensus: one is an incomplete report that the commenter had just started a Claude Code session, while the other asks whether free limits reset and appears concerned about access or quota impact. There is no discussion of mitigation, model behavior, or deployment tradeoffs, so operators get no actionable detail beyond possible user concern about limits during the incident. Overall sentiment — post: concerned; author: concerned. Reply threads: 2026-10-06 20:31 GMT+8: post=neutral, author=neutral — The commenter says they had just started a Claude Code session, but the incomplete comment does not establish… | 2026-10-06 20:49 GMT+8: post=concerned, author=concerned — The commenter asks whether free limits reset and addresses Anthropic sarcastically, indicating concern about… |
r/ClaudeCode
| # | Post | Summary | Time | Score | Author | Community reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agent Communication & Orchestration in VelaTerm | [Image: Agent Communication & Orchestration in VelaTerm] Communication: agents in different sessions can search and ask questions about each other’s conversations, send messages to one another, and see who is working. You can use the commands directly or just ask in plain language. | 2026-10-06 16:49 GMT+8 | /u/george-lin | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Commenters are skeptical that VelaTerm offers a meaningful advantage: Claude Code sessions, and allegedly Claude Code plus Codex across windows, can already communicate, while the author only broadly claims cross-agent orchestration and directing an agent team like employees. The main criticism is that the video and replies do not explain concrete capabilities or differentiators, so the product’s value proposition remains unsubstantiated; one user nevertheless asks what tool enables similar communication between agents working on API and frontend projects. Overall sentiment — post: skeptical; author: critical. Reply threads: 2026-10-06 17:55 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=neutral — They ask how VelaTerm differs from direct communication between Claude Code sessions. | 2026-10-06 17:56 GMT+8: post=positive, author=positive — The author claims the mechanism is intended for communication between different agents such as Claude and… | 2026-10-06 18:12 GMT+8: post=critical, author=critical — They say the post is product advertising, the video failed to explain the value proposition, and the author… | |
| 2 | Weekly Showcase Thread; What are you building with Claude Code? | Weekly Showcase Thread Built something with Claude Code this week? Apps, tools, experiments, scripts, websites, workflows, open-source projects — anything you’ve been working on is welcome. | 2026-10-05 19:32 GMT+8 | /u/AutoModerator | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): The comments are overwhelmingly showcase-oriented and positive toward using Claude Code for token tracking, rotating four-agent workflows, agent evals and cost optimization, JetBrains/terminal integrations, and game or tabletop tooling; one commenter specifically asks whether the token tracker is open source. The main caveat is operational rather than ideological: the Claude Code mods API reportedly lacked mature documentation and examples, requiring substantial steering and exposing edge cases, while the other projects provide little evidence about reliability, cost, or deployment beyond their authors’ brief descriptions. Overall sentiment — post: positive; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-05 20:01 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — The commenter is continuing a token tracker and says they are satisfied with the value from their 5x Max… | 2026-10-05 20:20 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — The commenter expresses interest in the token tracker and asks whether it is open source. | 2026-10-05 20:02 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — The commenter built a GitHub-published automation in which four agents rotate daily to create a unique task… |
r/Codex
| # | Post | Summary | Time | Score | Author | Community reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Are we Europeans missing out in the latest update? | When you consider that the biggest change in the new update was “GPT Dots,” and then realize that we don’t have access to Dots in any of the subscription plans, it is certainly frustrating. Especially considering that we are paying the same price. | 2026-10-06 19:53 GMT+8 | /u/danny_094 | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Comments largely agree that Europeans are missing a potentially useful GPT Dots opportunity, with users citing reports of millions of tokens during the free month, but several commenters question whether the feature is worth caring about and recommend Hermes, OpenClaw, external providers, or Chinese models instead. The practical operator takeaway is to use alternative harnesses and providers if Dots remains unavailable, while the reason for the regional restriction is disputed or speculative: one commenter blames EU data regulation and another argues Germany and France should make European availability a priority. Overall sentiment — post: concerned; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-06 20:11 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=neutral — They argue the native Codex harness is worse than Hermes or a well-configured small Pi, with response times… | 2026-10-06 20:08 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They believe users can accomplish substantial projects by using Dots effectively during the free first month,… | 2026-10-06 20:01 GMT+8: post=concerned, author=neutral — They claim the restriction is driven by monetizing user data and EU data regulation, and predict that Dots… | |
| 2 | Honestly i’m glad OpenAi truly understands what users need and want, and people say they are out of touch somehow, what nonsense | [Image: Honestly i’m glad OpenAi truly understands what users need and want, and people say they are out of touch somehow, what nonsense] Can’t wait to enjoy a month packed of useful and much requested features like… | 2026-10-06 16:20 GMT+8 | /u/Independent-Frequent | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Comments split between agreement with the post’s list of desired changes and strong criticism of its premise: one side argues consumer subscriptions should provide clearer, more consistent availability and pricing, while the other says changing inference costs make fixed compute impossible and that guaranteed throughput belongs on metered API plans rather than consumer tiers. The practical operator signal is dissatisfaction with OpenAI’s limits and service clarity, including users threatening to cancel their 20x subscriptions, but commenters disagree on whether that reflects provider failure or unrealistic expectations of a non-SLA product. Overall sentiment — post: mixed; author: mixed. Reply threads: 2026-10-06 18:05 GMT+8: post=positive, author=positive — They agree that the post covers every change they personally want to see happen. | 2026-10-06 18:58 GMT+8: post=critical, author=critical — They call the opposing expectations delusional, arguing that inference costs do not become commodity-like for… | 2026-10-06 19:49 GMT+8: post=positive, author=critical — They argue providers should not sell plans they cannot deliver consistently, preferring clear pay-as-you-go… |
Generated 2026-10-06 20:45 GMT+8 | Next update in 2 hours